Over the past week I’ve gone on a blitz, trying out various tools (both old and new) to see what they offer. The results were in line with my expectations, but it was still interesting to see.
At this point, pretty much everyone who uses the Internet on a frequent basis knows about Twitter. Now that the initial hype has died down, I’ve finally created my own account. The tool itself is relatively simple on a conceptual level, but I think that’s one of its main appeals. A single question (“What are you doing?”) is all that is asked, although it is by no means the only thing that you can tweet about.
Traditional channels have covered Twitter extensively over the last couple years. At one point, even Oprah Winfrey talked about it on her show, thereby putting it into mainstream use. We now see people of all sorts twittering, from celebrities to politicians. Is this bad? Well, it depends on your view I guess.
One issue of contention is that a lot of content on Twitter is just mindless noise (to most people). The classic example is that “people don’t care about what you had for breakfast”. While it is true that a lot of stuff being tweeted is of little value, this can be resolved by following the right people. For example, fans of Digg might follow Kevin Rose to see what he has planned for the future.
As for me, I’m tracking a lot of the leading experts in web development and design along with several game developers. What they have to say is often quite intriguing. Indeed, Twitter is a good source of news as oftentimes people are sending out tweets while events are happening. I can definitely see the value in using tool and if nothing else, it can supplement my microblogging habits (for years, I’ve put random comments next to my MSN nickname
). Actually, one of the reasons why I looked into Twitter was because it could update my Facebook status.
In conclusion, Twitter is – when used correctly – a valuable tool. It definitely synergizes well with a blog.
Stack Overflow / Super User
Both Stack Overflow and Super User are wiki-like tools designed to be Q&A sites. The former was created for programmers while the latter targets computer enthusiasts. The concept is simple: if you have a question on a topic, you can post it on the site and have various experts try to resolve it for you. You can also browse current open questions and help out where you can.
While I haven’t spent a lot of time on these two sites, I did notice that questions are (usually) answered extremely quickly. This could be useful in, say, debugging a project at work when you have to meet a deadline. The community also doesn’t look kindly upon “homework-like” questions, preferring inquirers to put in some effort. This is an attitude that I agree with; we don’t really need another way to destroy academic integrity.
As I mentioned, these are wiki-like tools, meaning you don’t need an account to post/answer questions. However, it’s likely that you’ll want one anyway to keep track of your activities on the site. One of the first things that I noticed when creating an account was that both SO and SU support OpenID. Now, this is actually the first time that I’ve used it so it was kind of interesting. It turns out that I already had an OpenID though, since Google was a provider (man, Google does everything now…). How convenient.
Well, I didn’t actually have any questions to ask so I can’t comment on that aspect. I did provide some answers though. Hopefully I didn’t embarrass myself.
StumbleUpon
I’ve heard about StumbleUpon back in high school, but this was the first time that I’ve taken a serious look at it. In essence, it is a service that builds a directory of content sorted by tags and serves it to users based on their interests. Through a pseudo-randomized algorithm, different content is shown to users when they click the “Stumble!” button on the toolbar provided. I guess the entire purpose of this is to expose people to new content that they might be interested in (and haven’t seen before).
After creating an account, you can post some basic information about yourself for other Stumblers to see. You then make a listing of your current interests for StumbleUpon to use. When this is done, all that’s left is to install the toolbar (or access the web-based one), click “Stumble!” and enjoy the show.
For each page that you stumble upon, you have two available options: thumb up (adds site to favourites) or thumb down (so you aren’t shown similar content in the future). When adding something to your list of favourites, you can choose to write a review of it. This is recommended if you want to be an active participant in the community. As for the list of favourites, there is actually a subset called discoveries. These discoveries are pages where you have been the first to visit (and thumb up); essentially, you are adding new content to the StumbleUpon index when you do so.
Seeing as StumbleUpon is built around its community, there are obviously tools that promote relationship-building. Among theses tools are friend lists and interest groups, on top of the profiles and reviews that I mentioned above. I haven’t actually tried out this aspect of StumbleUpon yet so I can’t really comment, but it shouldn’t be too far removed from other networking tools.
I’ve set my toolbar to look for content in the realm of computer science, nature, art, music, mythology and other similar topics. There are definitely some interesting things to see if you’re open-minded.

